Microsoft Interview Question


Country: United States




Comment hidden because of low score. Click to expand.
3
of 3 vote

Less than O(n^2) makes no sense. Go read up on the definition of BigOh.

As to an approach: here is a greedy approach: Pick a random element and pick the neighbour which is the smallest and less than it. (If there is no such neigbour, you found it). Repeat the process with the neighbour.

You will end up at some 'sink'. Not sure if the time complexity would be sub-quadratic, perhaps we can prove it...

- Anonymous August 23, 2012 | Flag Reply
Comment hidden because of low score. Click to expand.
0
of 0 votes

consider less than ==> better than

- Anonymous August 23, 2012 | Flag
Comment hidden because of low score. Click to expand.
0
of 0 votes

@Anonymous: Even "better than" does not make sense. Again, I suggest you read the definition of BigOh.

If you want to say better than quadratic, then the right way to say it is o(n^2). We are using SmallOh here, which is quite different from bigOh.

- Anonymous August 23, 2012 | Flag
Comment hidden because of low score. Click to expand.
0
of 0 votes

got your point ...
thanks

- Anonymous August 23, 2012 | Flag
Comment hidden because of low score. Click to expand.
0
of 0 votes

got your point ...
thanks

- Anonymous August 23, 2012 | Flag
Comment hidden because of low score. Click to expand.
0
of 0 votes

What about the boundary cells. Can we have them as sink?
Because if we don't then your algorithm will fail.

- Confused August 23, 2012 | Flag
Comment hidden because of low score. Click to expand.
0
of 0 votes

I am presuming you can.

- Anonymous August 23, 2012 | Flag
Comment hidden because of low score. Click to expand.
0
of 0 votes

I think this algorithm will perform 2*n steps in the worst case. I think this is O(n).

1,  2,  4,  7,  11,
      3,  5,  8,  12, 17,
      6,  9,  13, 18, 22,
      10, 14, 19, 23, 25,
      15, 20, 24, 26, 27;

If you have above matrix, and pick the right bottom element to start, then the search will take n+n comparisons.
The logic does not look at all elements, so it has got to do better than n^2.

- dc360 August 26, 2012 | Flag
Comment hidden because of low score. Click to expand.
0
of 0 votes

should we consider the corner elements?!!
Or it must have to be inside the outer boundary!?

- Psycho September 12, 2012 | Flag
Comment hidden because of low score. Click to expand.
0
of 0 vote

Less than o(n^2) means o(nlogn) or in between both??

- Psycho August 23, 2012 | Flag Reply
Comment hidden because of low score. Click to expand.
0
of 2 vote

there is no answer.

- hwen.tmp August 24, 2012 | Flag Reply
Comment hidden because of low score. Click to expand.
0
of 0 vote

#include <cstdio>

const int N = 5;
const int M = 5;

int a[N][M] = {1, 12, 3, 1, -23,  
			   7, 9, 8, 5, 6,
			   4, 5, 6, -1, 77,
			   7, 0, 35, -2, -4,
			   6, 83, 1, 7, -6};

int direct[4][2] = { {-1, 0}, {1, 0}, {0, -1}, {0, 1} };

void findLocalMin(int& resRow, int& resCol)
{	

	int curRow = N / 2;

	int curCol = 0;
	int curMin = a[curRow][curCol];

	for(int i = 0; i < M; i++)
	{
		if (a[curRow][i] < curMin)
		{
			curMin = a[curRow][i];
			curCol = i;
		}
	}

	bool flag = false;

	while(true)
	{
		flag = true;
		for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++)
		{
			int tempRow = curRow + direct[i][0];
			int tempCol = curCol + direct[i][1];

			if (tempRow < N && 
				tempCol < N && 
				a[curRow][curCol] > a[tempRow][tempCol])
			{
				curMin = a[tempRow][tempCol];
				curRow = tempRow; curCol = tempCol;
				flag = false;
				break;
			}
		}

		if (flag)
		{
			resRow = curRow; 
			resCol = curCol;
			return;
		}		
	}
};

int main()
{
	int resRow, resCol;
	findLocalMin(resRow, resCol);
	printf("%d", a[resRow][resCol]);
	return 0;
}

- Anonymous August 24, 2012 | Flag Reply
Comment hidden because of low score. Click to expand.
0
of 0 vote

here we have few points to consider we are not checking the elemnts in the boundaries
1)first we find the rows to be checkd
2)take an array of size number of rows which contains the info. as which rows are checkd

here is the idea with rough code..it may have mistakes suggest me if am wrong anywhere
#define rowno 5
static int count=0;//counts number of such elemnts
int d[r0wno];//array to keep track of rows checked
for(int i=0;i<rowno;i++)
d[i]=0;


findrows(int a[][],int start,int end)
{
int mid=(start+end)/2;
check(a,mid);
if((mid+1)!=(rowno-1) && a[mid+1]!=1)//checking if its last row
{
a[mid+1]=1;
check(a,mid+1);
}
if((mid-1)!=0 && a[mid-1]!=1)//checking if its first row
{
a[mid-1]=1;
check(a,mid-1);
}
findrows(a,start,mid-1);
findrows(a,mid+1,end);
}

check(a[][],int ind)
{
//start from 2nd column because first is boundary
for(int j=1;j<rowno-2;j++)
{
if(a[ind][j]<a[ind][j-1] && a[ind][j]<a[ind[j+1])
{
if(a[ind][j]<a[ind-1][j] && a[ind][j]<a[ind+1][j])
{
count++;
printf("found element %d",a[ind][j]);
}
}
}
}

- anuf August 24, 2012 | Flag Reply
Comment hidden because of low score. Click to expand.
0
of 0 vote

sry there a few mistakes in my previous code..modified code is
here we have few points to consider we are not checking the elemnts in the boundaries
1)first we find the rows to be checkd
2)take an array of size number of rows which contains the info. as which rows are checkd

here is the idea with rough code..it may have mistakes suggest me if am wrong anywhere
#define rowno 5
static int count=0;//counts number of such elemnts
int d[r0wno];//array to keep track of rows checked
for(int i=0;i<rowno;i++)
d[i]=0;

findrows(int a[][],int start,int end)
{
int mid=(start+end)/2;
check(a,mid);
if((mid+1)!=(rowno-1) && d[mid+1]!=1)//checking if its last row
{
d[mid+1]=1;
check(a,mid+1);
}
if((mid-1)!=0 && dmid-1]!=1)//checking if its first row
{
d[mid-1]=1;
check(a,mid-1);
}
findrows(a,start,mid-1);
findrows(a,mid+1,end);
}

check(a[][],int ind)
{
//start from 2nd column because first is boundary
for(int j=1;j<rowno-2;j++)
{
if(a[ind][j]<a[ind][j-1] && a[ind][j]<a[ind[j+1])
{
if(a[ind][j]<a[ind-1][j] && a[ind][j]<a[ind+1][j])
{
count++;
printf("found element %d",a[ind][j]);
}
}
}
}

//call findrows(a[][],0,rowno-1);

- anuf August 24, 2012 | Flag Reply
Comment hidden because of low score. Click to expand.
0
of 0 votes

1)it should also check the mid
after check(a,mid);
a[mid]=1;
2)in check function in the for loop condition is j<=rowno-2

- Anonymous August 24, 2012 | Flag
Comment hidden because of low score. Click to expand.
0
of 0 votes

it should be:
d[mid]=1;

- Ritesh August 25, 2012 | Flag
Comment hidden because of low score. Click to expand.
0
of 0 votes

isn't it O(n^2) ??

- Tushar August 25, 2012 | Flag
Comment hidden because of low score. Click to expand.
0
of 0 vote

int main()
{
int a[5][5]=
{
10, 2, 4, 7, 11,
3, 5, 8, 12, 17,
6, 9, 13, 18, 22,
10, 14, 19, 23, 25,
15, 20, 24, 26, 27
};
int i=0,j;
while(1)
{
for(j=0;j<=4;j++)
{
if(i==0 || j==0)
{
if(a[i][j]<a[i+1][j] && a[i][j]<a[i][j+1])
{
printf("i=%d j=%d\n",i,j);
getch();
}
}
else
{
if(a[i][j]<a[i+1][j] && a[i][j]<a[i][j+1] && a[i][j]<a[i-1][j] && a[i][j]< a[i][j-1])
{
printf("i=%d j=%d\n",i,j);
getch();
}
}
}
i++;
if(i==5)
break;
}
}

- Raghav August 27, 2012 | Flag Reply
Comment hidden because of low score. Click to expand.
0
of 0 vote

This can be done in O(n) time. If we divide the matrix into 4 equal sub-matrices, one of them must contain such (i, j). We can identify that sub-matrix by finding the smallest elements of the middle row and middle column. If this element satisfies the condition, then output it. Otherwise, it has a smaller neighbor. We continue to detect on the sub-matrix that contain this smaller neighbor. The running time is 2n + n + n/2 ... = 4n.

- Anonymous September 09, 2012 | Flag Reply
Comment hidden because of low score. Click to expand.
0
of 0 vote

public static int[] findLocalMimMatrix(int[][] matrix, int startRow, int endRow){
		int[] ret = new int[2];
		int midRow = startRow + (endRow - startRow) / 2;
		int rowMin = matrix[midRow][0];
		ret[0] = midRow;
		ret[1] = 0;
		// Get the minimum value of row (startRow + endRow ) / 2
		for(int i = 1; i < matrix[midRow].length; i ++){
			if(matrix[midRow][i] < rowMin){
				rowMin = matrix[midRow][i];
				ret[0] = midRow;
				ret[1] = i;
			}
		}
		int upNbr = Integer.MAX_VALUE, downNbr = Integer.MAX_VALUE;
		if(midRow - 1 >= startRow){
			upNbr = matrix[midRow - 1][ret[1]];
		}
		
		if(midRow + 1 <= endRow){
			downNbr = matrix[midRow + 1][ret[1]];
		}
		
		// Find a local minimum
		if(rowMin <= upNbr && rowMin <= downNbr){
			return ret;
		}else{
			// Shrink the matrix into half.
			if(upNbr >= downNbr){
				ret = findLocalMimMatrix(matrix, midRow + 1, endRow);
			}else{
				ret = findLocalMimMatrix(matrix, startRow, midRow - 1);
			}
			return ret;
		}
	}

The time complexity is O(N*lgN)

- alex December 08, 2013 | Flag Reply
Comment hidden because of low score. Click to expand.
-1
of 1 vote

We know that we dont have to check the outer elements of the matrix.
Thus, we are left with (N-2) rows as well as column.
Hence, the time complexity is (N-2)^2

- Jignesh Darji August 26, 2012 | Flag Reply


Add a Comment
Name:

Writing Code? Surround your code with {{{ and }}} to preserve whitespace.

Books

is a comprehensive book on getting a job at a top tech company, while focuses on dev interviews and does this for PMs.

Learn More

Videos

CareerCup's interview videos give you a real-life look at technical interviews. In these unscripted videos, watch how other candidates handle tough questions and how the interviewer thinks about their performance.

Learn More

Resume Review

Most engineers make critical mistakes on their resumes -- we can fix your resume with our custom resume review service. And, we use fellow engineers as our resume reviewers, so you can be sure that we "get" what you're saying.

Learn More

Mock Interviews

Our Mock Interviews will be conducted "in character" just like a real interview, and can focus on whatever topics you want. All our interviewers have worked for Microsoft, Google or Amazon, you know you'll get a true-to-life experience.

Learn More